also claimed that the charging document did not list a specific age of the
victim, the offense took place in California, counsel was ineffective, he was
entitled to additional presentence credit, and the judgment of conviction is
not final because it does not state the cost of the psychosexual exam. We
decline to consider the merits of these claims as they fell outside the
narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal
sentence. See Edwards, 112 Nev. at 708, 918 P,2d at 324. Accordingly, we
conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion,
and we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
J.
Parraguirre
— Thn)1A-1 4724 J.
Douglas
2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in
proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude
that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent
that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
Of
NEVADA
2
(0) I 947A en
cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge
Brian Eugene Lepley
Nye County District Attorney
Attorney General/Carson City
Nye County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A e