NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10205
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00547-RLH
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KIMBERLY CRAWFORD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 21, 2015**
Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Kimberly Crawford appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 11-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Crawford contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
explain adequately its reasons for rejecting her sentencing arguments. We review
for plain error, see United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), and
find none. The record reflects that the court considered Crawford’s arguments and
sufficiently explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992
(9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
Crawford next contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable in
light of her history of addiction and her rehabilitative efforts. The district court did
not abuse its discretion in imposing Crawford’s sentence. See Gall v. United States,
552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18
U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including
Crawford’s multiple violations of supervised release and the need to afford adequate
deterrence. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.
AFFIRMED.
2 14-10205