in Re M & M Orthodontics, PA

Related Cases

M&M Orthodontics, PA v. Christine Ellis Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity Rick Gilpin, in His Official Capacity And the Office of the Inspector General
M&M Orthodontics, PA v. Christine Ellis Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity Rick Gilpin, in His Official Capacity And the Office of the Inspector General
M&M Orthodontics P.A.and Harlingen Family Dentistry v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commiss
M&M Orthodontics P.A.and Harlingen Family Dentistry v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commiss
M&M Orthodontics P.A.and Harlingen Family Dentistry v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Dr. Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commiss

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00084-CV In re M&M Orthodontics, PA ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Real parties in interest Christine Ellis; Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC); Dr. Kyle Janek, in his Official Capacity; and the Office of the Inspector General have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this mandamus proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. The real parties in interest have advised the Court that the underlying administrative action that was pending against relator M&M Orthodontics in the HHSC Appeals Division has been nonsuited and dismissed, rendering moot the issues raised by M&M Orthodontics in its petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. __________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field Filed: January 30, 2015