IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00205-CR
CHRISTOPHER JASON HALL,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 220th District Court
Bosque County, Texas
Trial Court No. 06-11-14071 BCCR
ORDER
Counsel for appellant filed an Anders1 brief. After the Court was notified that the
record had been provided to appellant, the Court set the time for appellant’s pro se
brief or other response to counsel’s Anders brief to be due within 45 days.
Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file a petition for
discretionary review. A petition for discretionary review is premature because a
judgment has not yet been issued by this Court in this matter. TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).
Further, because appellant’s original counsel on appeal has been removed and new
counsel has been appointed, our 45-day timetable for appellant to file a pro se brief or
other response is set aside and a response is not due at this time.
Accordingly, appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for
Discretionary Review is dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
45 day response set aside; motion dismissed as moot
Order issued and filed January 29, 2015
Hall v. State Page 2