United States v. Brandon Thomas

Case: 13-31197 Document: 00512925990 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-31197 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 4, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. BRANDON J. THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CR-206-1 Before Davis, Clement, and Costa, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Brandon J. Thomas appeals the 90-month term of imprisonment imposed on resentencing for his conviction for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base. Thomas argues that the district court erroneously based the upward variance on his prior involvement in dog fighting and thus his sentence is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-31197 Document: 00512925990 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/04/2015 No. 13-31197 In response to Thomas’s challenge to the substantive reasonableness of his sentence, the Government argues, among other things, that this court should dismiss Thomas’s appeal based upon the plea agreement’s appeal waiver. Pursuant to the terms of the waiver, Thomas waived the right to directly appeal his sentence on any ground, reserving only the right to challenge any sentence imposed in excess of the statutory maximum; this waiver includes the instant substantive reasonableness challenge. Because the appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary and because the Government seeks the enforcement of the appeal waiver, the appeal is dismissed. See United States v. Walters, 732 F.3d 489, 491 (5th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1349 (2014). APPEAL DISMISSED. 2