In Re Douglass - Case Law

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

          IN RE ANDREW IAN DOUGLASS

                ______________________

                      2014-1207
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 09/527,507.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   JOHN THOMAS HARDING, Morrison Mahoney, LLP,
Boston, MA argued for appellant. Also represented by
JOSEPH B. MILSTEIN, Milstein Zhang & Wu LLC, Newton,
MA.

   JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
appellee. Also represented by JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON,
NATHAN K. KELLEY.
               ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
    PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Cir-
cuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


February 9, 2015               /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court