State v. Villegas

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. 34,149 5 CONRAD VILLEGAS, JR., 6 Defendant-Appellant, 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 8 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge 9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 14 Will O’Connell, Assistant Appellate Defender 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 {1} Defendant contends that he received an illegal sentence when, following a 2 probation violation, the trial court did not credit him with the time he served while 3 incarcerated on his original sentence. [DS 5] Our notice agreed with Defendant and 4 proposed to reverse and remand for resentencing. 5 {2} The State has responded to our notice, indicating that the State does not oppose 6 our proposed disposition. [MIO 2] Additionally, we note that the State suggests that 7 Defendant is entitled to 365 days of credit, as opposed to 364 days, as provided in our 8 notice. [MIO 2; DS 5; CN 2] 9 {3} Accordingly, for the reasons detailed in our notice and discussed above, we 10 reverse and remand to the district court for resentencing. 11 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 _______________________________________ 14 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 17 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 18 19 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2