NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50336
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-01552-DMS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LUIS CRUZ-CARRASCO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2015**
Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Luis Cruz-Carrasco appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Cruz-Carrasco contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
to address his non-frivolous mitigation arguments. We review for harmless error,
see United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 631 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir. 2011) (per
curiam), and find no error. The record reflects that the district court expressly
addressed Cruz-Carrasco’s mitigation arguments before it imposed a below-
Guidelines revocation sentence.
AFFIRMED.
2 14-50336