Amended ALD-129 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 14-4499
___________
IN RE: DE SHAWN DRUMGO,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
(Related to D. Del. Civ. No. 1-12-cv-00127)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
March 5, 2015
Before: RENDELL, CHAGARES and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges
(Filed: March 19, 2015)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Petitioner De Shawn Drumgo seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United
States District Court for the District of Delaware to issue a ruling on his habeas petition,
which he filed in January 2012. Drumgo also has filed a motion for recusal of the
District Judge and a motion for appointment of counsel.
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
The State filed a response to the habeas petition in December 2012. At the time
Drumgo submitted his mandamus petition to this Court, his habeas petition had been
pending for about two years. However, the record reflects that the District Court denied
habeas relief by order entered December 10, 2014, prior to the Clerk’s receipt of the
proof of service of this petition required under Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). Drumgo has
filed a notice of appeal from the District Court’s order, and his appeal is pending at C.A.
No. 14-4825.
Given that the District Court has ruled on the habeas petition, Drumgo has
received the relief sought in his mandamus petition. Thus, we will dismiss the petition as
moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996). No
action can be taken the motion for recusal. Recusal motions are directed to a particular
judge and thus should be filed in the case in which the matter is proceeding. As we have
explained, the case related to this mandamus petition is no longer pending before the
District Judge whose recusal Drumgo seeks. The motion for appointment of counsel is
denied.
2