UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-440
In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner.
No. 14-441
In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner.
No. 14-443
In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner.
No. 14-444
In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner.
No. 14-445
In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner.
No. 14-447
In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:13-mc-00005-H; 4:13-mc-00006-H; 4:13-
mc-00007-H; 4:13-mc-00008-H; 4:14-mc-00001-H; 4:14-mc-00002-H)
Submitted: March 9, 2015 Decided: March 18, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s
orders denying authorization to file six civil actions and
denying his motions for recusal and to amend his pleadings under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Willis is required to file a motion for
leave to file a complaint in the Eastern District of North
Carolina under pre-filing injunctions imposed by this court and
the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. In re: Willis, Nos. 4:13-mc-00005-H;
4:13-mc-00006-H; 4:13-mc-00007-H; 4:13-mc-00008-H; 4:14-mc-
00001-H; 4:14-mc-00002-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12 & Sept. 15, 2014).
We deny Willis’s motion to file the appeal under the pre-filing
injunction, or for permission to appeal, as unnecessary. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3