UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1609
ESTHER KINOBE MPUNGU NAKAGIRI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Jennifer L. Lightbody, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Andrea N. Gevas, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Esther Kinobe Mpungu Nakagiri, a native and citizen of
Uganda, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the
immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reopen. We have
thoroughly reviewed the record, including the relevant orders,
Nakagiri’s affidavit, and the various supporting exhibits, and
conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS
v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323–24 (1992); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552
F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741,
747 (4th Cir. 2006); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3) (2014).
Further, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not
to sua sponte reopen Nakagiri’s removal proceedings. Mosere,
552 F.3d at 400–01. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Nakagiri
(B.I.A. May 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2