Filed 3/24/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 54
Daniel Joseph Myers, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140295
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Samuel A. Gereszek, 308 DeMers Avenue, P.O. Box 4, East Grand Forks, Minnesota 56721-0004, for petitioner and appellant.
Alexander J. Stock, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for respondent and appellee.
Myers v. State
No. 20140295
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Daniel Myers appeals from a district court order denying him post-conviction relief. He argues the district court erred in denying him post-conviction relief, because the court’s findings were not supported by evidence contained in the record. He also argues for the first time on appeal that upon revocation of his probation, the district court erred by imposing an unauthorized extension of his sentence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding that, after holding an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied Myers’ post-conviction relief application on the basis of findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. We also affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See State v. Hammer , 2010 ND 152, ¶ 21, 787 N.W.2d 716 (“[T]his Court will not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.”).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner