Brady Craig Koch, Jr. v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-14-00248-CR Style: Brady Craig Koch, Jr. v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: April 2, 2015 Type of motion: First Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief Is appeal accelerated? No If motion to extend time: Original due date: March 9, 2015 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: March 9, 2015 Date Requested: June 20, 2015 Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: June 22, 2015  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because appellant’s counsel contends that she was not retained to represent appellant, who was found not indigent for appellate purposes, she is proceeding pro bono on appeal, and was set for a few trials in other cases and had other commitments, including getting married in May, appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file appellant’s brief is granted, but no further extensions will be granted given the length of time requested. Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by June 22, 2015, the Court may abate this appeal for a hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Date: April 16, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision