UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1071
VANESSA SPENCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, d/b/a Wal-Mart,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge.
(8:13-cv-01895-WGC)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vanessa Spence, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Andrew Kohl, DECARO,
DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vanessa Spence appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and
closing her civil action. * On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Spence’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Spence has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the
parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
2