MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
May 12 2015, 10:47 am
this Memorandum Decision shall not
be regarded as precedent or cited before
any court except for the purpose of
establishing the defense of res judicata,
collateral estoppel, or the law of the
case.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Mark A. Thoma Gregory F. Zoeller
Deputy Public Defender Attorney General of Indiana
Leonard, Hammond, Thoma &
Terrill Brian Reitz
Fort Wayne, Indiana Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Angela M. Beck, May 12, 2015
Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
02A05-1410-CR-497
v.
Appeal from the Allen Superior
Court
State of Indiana,
Appellee-Plaintiff Honorable Frances C. Gull,
Judge
Cause No. 02D06-1309-FB-172
Friedlander, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 1 of 8
[1] Angela Beck appeals the sentence she received following her conviction of
Neglect of a Dependent Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury,1 a class B felony.
Beck contends on appeal that her fifteen-year sentence is inappropriate in light
of the nature of her offense and her character.
[2] We affirm.
[3] As a result of Beck’s daily methadone use, her son, L.B., was born on February
1, 2012 with methadone in his system. L.B. joined an older sister and an older
brother, who were approximately ten and twelve years old, respectively, at the
time. Beck also used Adderall, Xanax, and cocaine. After taking this
combination of drugs, Beck would be awake for two or three days at a time,
and then sleep the next two or three days.
[4] Nicole Conn babysat for Beck. Although she would agree to watch the children
“for a few hours”, Conn would often be required to stay much longer because
Conn “didn’t hear from [Beck] and she didn’t show up.” Transcript at 291. It
was not uncommon for Conn to stay for “a couple days”, and once she stayed
eleven or twelve days consecutively. Id. at 293. Early in 2013, Conn began
noticing injuries on L.B. The first was a large bruise on his face, which Conn
1
The version of the governing statute, i.e., Ind. Code Ann. § 35-46-1-4(b)(2) (West, Westlaw 2013) in effect
at the time this offense was committed classified it as a class B felony. This statute has since been revised and
in its current form reclassifies this as a Level 3 felony. See I.C. 35-46-1-4(b)(2) (West, Westlaw current with
legislation of the 2015 First Regular Session of the 119th General Assembly effective through April 23, 2015).
The new classification, however, applies only to offenses committed on or after July 1, 2014. See id. Because
this offense was committed before then, it retains the former classification.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 2 of 8
described as larger than a softball. After she observed the first large bruise,
Conn observed that L.B. had a different injury every time she saw him. These
injuries included bruises to his nose, toenail, scrotum, and lip. Conn eventually
made an anonymous phone call to the Department of Child Services (DCS) and
reported what she had seen. At about the same time, Lynne Riddle, a
babysitter for Charissa Vela, a neighbor of Beck’s, noticed that Beck left L.B.
unattended outside on her back porch in a stroller for between twenty-five and
forty-five minutes. L.B. cried during that time, but no one responded.
According to Vela, she often would see L.B. left in the backyard either by
himself or with children for periods of time. On occasion, she observed that he
was left outside in cool weather without adequate protection from the cold.
One time, she saw him with “a bruise that took up the whole top right part of
his head.” Id. at 280. When Vela asked L.B.’s sister how he sustained the
bruise, she was told that he fell.
[5] Gregory Higgins lived with and had a romantic relationship with Beck between
March and May 2013. On one occasion during that time, Higgins discovered
Beck passed out and L.B. outside on the porch alone in a stroller. On another
occasion, Higgins happened to walk by the bathroom while Beck was giving
L.B. bath. He saw L.B. in the bathtub and Beck sitting on the floor, apparently
asleep.2 Higgins once observed Beck squeeze L.B. until his face became red.
2
Higgins described it as follows: "[Beck] was givin’ him a bath. I just happened to be walkin’ by … and she
nods out. She just kind of leaned down like this a little bit, moves back and forth, I just observe that
happening so I woke her up." Id. at 63.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 3 of 8
According to Higgins, Beck would “fairly frequently” give L.B. “a lot” of cold
medicine in order to put him to sleep. Id. at 68 and 67, respectively.
[6] On May 9, 2013, Higgins and Beck left L.B. at home with the older children at
approximately 10:00 p.m. They stayed out all night, with Beck taking Adderall
to stay awake. They returned home around 5:00 or 6:00 a.m. on May 10.
Several hours later, Higgins took L.B. upstairs and set him on the floor. As
Higgins began to dress, he fell asleep. When he awoke, he noted that L.B. was
not in the room and the baby gate was not up. He found L.B. unconscious on
the landing of the stairway. Higgins picked up L.B. and took him outside to
Beck. Beck took him to the emergency room at St. Joseph’s Hospital, where
nurse Melissa Holley described him as “floppy and unresponsive, barely
breathing”, with bruising on his forehead and around his eyes. Id. at 42. Beck
told Holley that she had left L.B. in Higgins’s care and gone outside to work.
When Beck returned into the house she found L.B. unresponsive at the foot of
the stairs and Higgins was asleep. A CT scan revealed that L.B. had a “head
bleed”. Id. at 45. L.B. was intubated and sedated and, because of the severity
of his condition, he was transported to Lutheran Children’s Hospital. While in
the ambulance, Beck called Conn and, in a whisper, asked if Conn would claim
she watched L.B. the night before.
[7] L.B. was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Dr. David Smith was
called to consult. When he arrived, Dr. Smith found L.B. paralyzed and on a
ventilator. He was in a “very profound and deep coma”. Id. at 116. The
doctor observed that L.B. had suffered “extensive” head and facial trauma. Id.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 4 of 8
at 101. He had a large bruise above the bridge of his nose and clusters of
bruises on his left and right scalp that were older than the other bruises. Dr.
Smith explained that based upon the size and location of those clusters of
bruises, “it looked like he had probably been grabbed with two hands very tight
and squeezed.” Id. at 102. Dr. Smith also noted that L.B. had a bruised left
toe, an abrasion to the left eye, bruises on his lower back, and an injury to the
inside of his mouth. L.B. had also sustained two internal injuries, including
retinal hemorrhages and blood in the space around his brain. According to Dr.
Smith, it was very unlikely that these injuries were caused by falling down three
carpeted stairs. As he described it, “he’d have to fall multiple times in multiple
places and multiple directions and upside down and backwards and it just
doesn’t make sense.” Id. at 114. Instead, the doctor opined that the injuries
were caused by “multiple blows to the body from either hand or fingers or some
other object [.]” Id. at 113. Dr. Terra Harris, a child-abuse pediatrician,
testified that L.B.’s brain injury was the result of his head being subjected to “a
violent amount of force”. Id. at 161.
[8] Beck was charged with neglect of a dependent, as a class B felony. She was
convicted following a jury trial and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment.
She appeals the sentence imposed.
[9] Beck contends that her sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of her
offense and her character. Article 7, section 4 of the Indiana Constitution
grants our Supreme Court the power to review and revise criminal sentences.
See Knapp v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1274 (Ind. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S.Ct. 978 (2015).
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 5 of 8
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 7, the Supreme Court authorized this court to
perform the same task. Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219 (Ind. 2008). Per
App. R. 7(B), we may revise a sentence “if after due consideration of the trial
court’s decision, the Court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the
nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” Inman v. State, 4
N.E.3d 190, 203 (Ind. 2014) (quoting App. R. 7). “Sentencing review under
Appellate Rule 7(B) is very deferential to the trial court.” Conley v. State, 972
N.E.2d 864, 876 (Ind. 2012). Beck bears the burden on appeal of persuading us
that her sentence is inappropriate. Conley v. State, 972 N.E.2d 864.
[10] The determination of whether we regard a sentence as inappropriate “turns on
our sense of the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the
damage done to others, and myriad other factors that come to light in a given
case.” Bethea v. State, 983 N.E.2d 1134, 1145 (Ind. 2013) (quoting Cardwell v.
State, 895 N.E.2d at 1224). Moreover, “[t]he principal role of such review is to
attempt to leaven the outliers.” Chambers v. State, 989 N.E.2d 1257, 1259 (Ind.
2013). It is not our goal in this endeavor to achieve the perceived “correct”
sentence in each case. Knapp v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1274. Accordingly, “the
question under Appellate Rule 7(B) is not whether another sentence is more
appropriate; rather, the question is whether the sentence imposed is
inappropriate.” King v. State, 894 N.E.2d 265, 268 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008)
(emphasis in original). Our Supreme Court has indicated that when analyzing
the appropriateness of a criminal sentence, there is “no right answer ... in any
given case.” Brown v. State, 10 N.E.3d 1, 8 (Ind. 2014) (quoting Cardwell v. State,
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 6 of 8
895 N.E.2d at 1224). Rather, appellate review and, where appropriate, revision
“ultimately boils down to the appellate court’s ‘collective sense of what is
appropriate, not a product of a deductive reasoning process.’” Id. (quoting
Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d at 1225).
[11] In order to assess the appropriateness of a sentence, we first look to the
statutory range established for the classification of the relevant offense. Beck
was convicted of a class B felony – neglect of a dependent. The advisory
sentence for a class B felony is ten years, with the minimum and maximum
sentence being six and twenty years, respectively. Beck was sentenced to a term
enhanced by five years beyond the advisory, but five years short of the
maximum.
[12] We begin with an examination of Beck’s character. Beck points to testimony
and letters submitted by friends and family who asserted that Beck wants the
best for her children. Although acknowledging that Beck is not perfect and has
made bad choices, her friends and family shared their belief that Beck is
remorseful about the injuries sustained by L.B. and regard her as a loving and
caring mother. We cannot help but note, however, the stark difference between
these characterizations of Beck’s maternal instincts and the neglectful and
sometimes brutal way in which infant L.B. was treated while in her care.
Moreover, we note that Beck has a criminal history that includes four
misdemeanor convictions and one felony conviction for child endangerment.
There also was a plethora of evidence indicating that Beck has a serious
substance-abuse problem and that while under the influence of controlled
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 7 of 8
substances, Beck is frequently unconscious and thus incapable of taking care of
her children. She also was unexpectedly absent from the home for long periods
of time, thereby foisting the duty of caring for her children upon Conn. Yet,
Beck refused to stop taking methadone long enough to participate in substance-
abuse treatment that was offered to her. Finally, a member of the Fort Wayne
Police Department heard Beck say on one occasion when her children were
being removed from her that she did not care because it would give her a break.
According to the officer, “she was more concerned about her prescription pills
and drugs that … we had confiscated [.]” Transcript at 201.
[13] We turn now to the nature of the offense. L.B.’s injuries, as described by his
treating physicians and depicted in photos included in the record, bespeak
brutal treatment that was not confined to a single episode. Higgins once saw
Beck abusing L.B. in a manner consistent with the injuries to L.B.’s head as
described by Dr. Smith. There was also evidence that Beck regularly left the
infant unattended outside for inappropriate amounts of time, and that she
drugged L.B. on a regular basis in order to get him to sleep. In view of the
above, we are not persuaded that the fifteen-year sentence is inappropriate.
[14] Judgment affirmed.
Baker, J., and Najam, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A05-1410-CR-497 |May 12, 2015 Page 8 of 8