United States v. Darryl Burton

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 18 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10612 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:85-cr-00205-LJO v. MEMORANDUM* DARRYL BURTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 13, 2015** Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Darryl Burton appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Burton’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel of record. Burton has filed a pro se supplemental opening brief. No answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 13-10612