In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-1041V
Filed: April 24, 2015
Unpublished
****************************
CHRISTINE HALEY, *
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
* Influenza or Flu Vaccine; Adhesive
* Capsulitis; Shoulder Injury Related to
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Administration; SIRVA;
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit
*
Respondent. *
*
****************************
Joseph Pepper, Esq. (acting for Ronald Homer), Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C.,
Boston, MA, for petitioner.
Ann Martin, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Vowell, Chief Special Master:
On October 27, 2014, Christine Haley filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,2 [the
“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered adhesive capsulitis
which was caused by the flu vaccine she received on January 16, 2013. Petition at 1.
The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On February 2, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to
compensation for her shoulder injury related to vaccine administration [“SIRVA”]. On
April 24, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] indicating
petitioner should be awarded $127,082.86 “which represents all elements of
compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).”
Proffer at 1.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501
note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump
sum payment of $127,082.86 in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
Christine Haley. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
s/Denise K. Vowell
Denise K. Vowell
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
Case 1:14-vv-01041-UNJ Document 18 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
____________________________________
)
CHRISTINE HALEY, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 14-1041V
v. ) Chief Special Master Vowell
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
____________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$127,082.86, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be
entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $127,082.86 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
Case 1:14-vv-01041-UNJ Document 18 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 2
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
MICHAEL P. MILMOE
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ ANN D. MARTIN
ANN D. MARTIN
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 307-1815
DATED: April 24, 2015
2