Case: 14-30929 Document: 00513061375 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-30929
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
BELVA WEBB; FAITH WEBB, June 1, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce
Plaintiffs-Appellants Clerk
v.
JOSEPH P. MORELLA,
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:10-CV-1557
Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This case is before us on appeal for the second time, having been
remanded the first time for the district court to determine the precise quantum
of sanctions imposed under Rule 11. This time, the sole issue on appeal is the
district court’s ruling on remand that denied Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Rule 59
Motion and determined the precise amounts of the sanctions under Rule 11.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 14-30929 Document: 00513061375 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2015
No. 14-30929
Like everything heretofore presented by Plaintiffs-Appellants and their
counsel, both to the district court and to us in the prior appeal, the instant
appeal is totally without basis in fact and in law and wholly unmeritorious.
We therefore affirm all rulings presented in this appeal, but note in passing
that Plaintiffs-Appellants and their counsel are fortunate that Defendant-
Appellee has not sought further sanctions or penalties under Federal Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38 for a frivolous appeal. We nevertheless caution
Plaintiffs-Appellants and their counsel against further prolongation of this
unduly protracted and meritless litigation, lest they incur additional sanctions
and penalties.
AFFIRMED.
2