In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_________________
NO. 09-15-00240-CV
_________________
IN RE KATHLEEN THOMAS
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief, Kathleen
Thomas (Relator or Thomas), challenges various interlocutory rulings and the final
judgment of the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, in a fee
dispute between Thomas and her former counsel. The trial court signed the final
judgment on May 11, 2015. An original proceeding for a writ of mandamus “is not
a substitute for an appeal.” In re Sec. Nat’l Ins., No. 14-11-00013-CV, 2011 WL
332712, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 3, 2011, orig. proceeding)
1
(mem. op.). 1 Mandamus relief is not available to Thomas because the trial court
has signed an appealable final judgment. See In re Harrell, No. 01-13-00517-CV,
2014 WL 866044, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 4, 2014, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.). Thomas has an adequate remedy by appeal. Id.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary
relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered June 16, 2015
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
1
Generally, an appeal from a final judgment must be taken within thirty days
of the date the judgment is signed by filing a notice of appeal with the trial court.
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, 26.1. A ninety-day period to perfect an appeal applies if
an appropriate post-judgment motion has been timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P.
26.1(a). An extension of time to file a notice of appeal may be granted if the notice
of appeal is filed within fifteen days of the deadline, and the appellant files a
motion for extension of time or establishes that she made a bona fide attempt to
invoke the appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals within fifteen days of the
deadline. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; see also Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615,
617 (Tex. 1997).
2