IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60764
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRADLEY WHITE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
1:01-CR-22-ALL-B
_____________________________
June 14, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bradley White appeals his conviction for the offense of traveling interstate for the purpose
of engaging in sexual conduct with a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). He contends that
the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement and in allowing the
government to introduce electronic mail correspondence.
We have reviewed the record and found no error in the district court’s denial of the
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is
not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
motion to suppress. The district court did not err in refusing to find that White was in custody.
With respect to whether White invoked his right to counsel, the record supports the district
court’s conclusion that White’s reference to an attorney was ambiguous and equivocal. See Davis
v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 2355 (1994).
Finally, White has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the
electronic mail correspondence. See United States v. Siddiqui, 235 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.
2