United States v. John Hyder

Case: 14-10665 Document: 00513106983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-10665 FILED Summary Calendar July 7, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOHN RASHON HYDER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-330 Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John Rashon Hyder has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hyder has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hyder’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 14-10665 Document: 00513106983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2015 No. 14-10665 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The record, however, reflects a clerical error in the written judgment. The written judgment reflects a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). In fact, Hyder pleaded guilty to violating and was sentenced under § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. Higgins, 739 F.3d 733, 739 n.16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2319 (2014); United States v. Rosales, 448 F. App’x 466, 466-67 (5th Cir. 2011). 2