| Cangro v Reitano |
| 2015 NY Slip Op 06023 |
| Decided on July 9, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 9, 2015
Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Moskowitz, Clark, JJ.
15671 100381/13
v
Gina Marie Reitano, Defendant-Respondent.
Jennifer Cangro, appellant pro se.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered August 5, 2014, dismissing the complaint, granting defendant a protective order, and awarding a sanction against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action, plaintiff raises claims identical to those she raised in a prior action that was dismissed as res judicata (Cangro v Reitano, 92 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 965 [2012]).
The award of sanctions against plaintiff and a protective order in favor of defendant are fully supported by the record (see Levy v Carol Mgt. Group, 260 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 1999]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JULY 9, 2015
CLERK