The State of
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
July 17, 2015
No. 04-15-00183-CR
Richard LARES,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006CR10110
Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding
ORDER
After Appellant filed a pro se motion to stay judgment and conviction, on July 2, 2015,
we denied the motion because Appellant is represented in this appeal by court-appointed counsel.
After his counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw, Appellant filed a motion to
reconsider our denial of his motion to stay judgment and conviction.
Appellant is still represented by counsel. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 411 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2008) (noting court-appointed counsel’s duties continue until, inter alia, the motion
to withdraw has been granted). Appellant does not have a right to hybrid representation. See Ex
parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).
Appellant’s pro se motion to reconsider our July 2, 2015 order is DENIED.
_________________________________
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 17th day of July, 2015.
___________________________________
Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court