IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 42549
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 493
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: May 15, 2015
)
v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
JAIME SALATIEL TREVINO, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified fifteen-year sentence with a minimum period
of confinement of three and one-half years for aggravated battery, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; LANSING, Judge;
and GRATTON, Judge
________________________________________________
PER CURIAM
Jaime Salatiel Trevino pled guilty to one count of aggravated battery, Idaho Code §§ 18-
903(a), 18-907(b). The district court imposed a unified fifteen-year sentence with a minimum
period of confinement of three and one-half years. Trevino appeals, contending that his sentence
is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Trevino’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2