proceedings. See Dornbach v. Tenth Judicial Dist. Court, 130 Nev., Adv.
Op. 33, 324 P.3d 369, 373-74 (2014) (noting that district courts have
inherent" case-management authority). Lastly, the record demonstrates
that the district court considered the appropriate factors and acted within
its discretion in determining that appellants' repeated failures to comply
with respondents' discovery requests and the district court's November
2013 order warranted dismissal of their complaint. See Young v. Johnny
Ribeiro Bldg., Inc., 106 Nev. 88, 92-93, 787 P.2d 777, 779-80 (1990)
(recognizing that the district court has the discretion to dismiss a
complaint as a discovery sanction so long as certain factors are
considered). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
, C.J.
Hardesty
lb J.
Saitta
cc: Ninth Judicial District Court Dept. 2
Michelle Kozlowski
Steven John Kozlowski
Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno
Douglas County Clerk
'In light of our resolution of this appeal, no action needs to be taken
with regard to appellants' October 1, 2014, motion, their October 23, 2014,
notice, or their May 14, 2015, motion, and any requests therein are denied
as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A