equitable relief after NRCP 60(b)'s time period has expired, Doan, 130
Nev., Adv. Op. 48, 327 P.3d at 501-02, such relief was not warranted here
since the assets were actually adjudicated. An asset is adjudicated if the
parties had a fair opportunity to litigate the division of the property. Id.
at 502. Here, the district court specifically found that the property at
issue had been previously litigated and adjudicated in the divorce decree,
and substantial evidence supports the district court's determination. The
record indicates that appellant had a fair opportunity to litigate the
division of each of the assets he identifies, and the divorce decree disposes
of the categories of property appellant contends were left undivided.
Appellant's assertion that certain property was not explicitly named in the
divorce decree is inconsequential, because the fact that an asset was not
mentioned in the decree is not an exceptional circumstance justifying
equitable relief. Id. at 503.
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 1
I- SIl
. a.
Saitta
Gibbon's Pickering
gdeu , J.
'Appellant's requests for relief regarding fees and costs are denied.
Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Rest., 122 Nev. 317, 330 n.38, 130 P.3d
1280, 1288 n.38 (2006) (providing that this court need not consider claims
that are not cogently argued or supported by relevant authority).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA 2
10) 1947A eD
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge
Brian P. Hunt
Peter B. Jaquette
Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) [947A e