Janice Grenadier v. BWW Law Group

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1169 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R. GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LASALLE BANK, as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants – Appellees, and BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB) Submitted: July 30, 2015 Decided: August 13, 2015 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint and denying her motion for reconsideration We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 30 & Feb. 19, 2015). We deny Grenadier’s motion to vacate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3