COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00566-CV
Style: In re Valero Refining – Texas, L.P., Relator
Date motion filed*: August 7, 2015
Type of motion: First Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Brief
Parties filing motion: Real Parties in Interest Vernon Fox and Mikki Fox
Document to be filed: Response to Mandamus Petition
Is appeal accelerated? Yes (mandamus).
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: August 10, 2015
Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: August 10, 2015
Date Requested: September 9, 2015
Ordered that motion is:
Granted
If document is to be filed, document due: September 9, 2015.
No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Denied
Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
Other: _____________________________________
Given counsel’s previously-planned vacation and the voluminous record, the real
parties in interest’s unopposed motion for an extension to file their response to the
mandamus petition until September 9, 2015, is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2,
10.3(a)(2),10.5(b)(1). However, counsel is warned that no further extensions will be
granted absent extraordinary circumstances because this is a mandamus petition.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Date: August 18, 2015
November 7, 2008 Revision