Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney of Maryland

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1497 CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY OF MARYLAND, Rod Rosenstein, et al; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees. No. 15-1786 CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney General - Respondents et al defendants: Melvin Bright, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01137-JFM; 1:15-cv-02005-JFM ) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. US Attorney of Md., No. 1:15- cv-01137-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 30, 2015; entered May 1, 2015); Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM (D. Md. July 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3