United States v. Cyrus Braswell

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 01 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-30014 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:97-cr-00068-JKS v. MEMORANDUM* CYRUS D.A. BRASWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska James K. Singleton, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 25, 2015** Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Cyrus D.A. Braswell appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Braswell’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). record. Braswell has filed pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 14-30014