Opinion issued July 17, 2003
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NOS. 01-02-01323-CR
01-02-01324-CR
____________
WILLIE WARE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 174th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 884021 and 884020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Willie Ware, pleaded guilty to two charges of sexual assault without a plea bargain agreement. After the preparation of a presentence investigation report, the trial court assessed punishment in each case at confinement for 10 years. We affirm.
Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd).
The brief states that a copy was delivered to appellant, along with a copy of the appellate record. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeals are wholly frivolous.
We affirm the judgments.
We grant counsel's motion to withdraw. (1) See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Higley.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1.