Opinion issued July 17, 2003
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00713-CR
____________
JAIME MENDOZA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 184th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 736152
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Jaime Mendoza, was found to have violated the conditions of his deferred adjudication community supervision by the trial court. The court found appellant guilty of aggravated assault, and assessed punishment at confinement for two years and a fine of $250. We affirm the judgment, as modified.
Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd).
The brief states that a copy was delivered to appellant, whom counsel advised by letter of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We find no reversible error in the record.
However, we do find nonreversible error in the judgment; it reads that appellant's first name is "Jamie." We may correct and modify the judgment of a trial court to make the record speak the truth when we have the necessary data and information to do so, or to make any appropriate order as the law and nature of the case may require. See Campbell v. State, 900 S.W.2d 763, 773 (Tex. App.--Waco 1995, no pet.); Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b), 43.6. Accordingly, we modify the trial court's judgment to read that appellant's name is "Jaime" Mendoza.
We affirm the judgment, as modified. (1)
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Higley.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1.