Opinion issued January 9, 2003
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00381-CR
____________
JAE NATHAN MILLER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 262nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 744026
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Jae Nathan Miller, pleaded guilty to aggravated assault of a public servant on June 5, 1997. The State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt to which appellant pleaded true on March 5, 2002. The trial court sentenced appellant to 20 years' confinement. The presence of a court reporter was waived at the adjudication hearing. We affirm.
Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd).
Counsel certifies that the brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous.
We affirm the judgment.
We grant counsel's motion to withdraw. (1) See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Keyes, and Duggan. (2)
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1. 2.