in Re Shail Alam

Opinion issued May 20, 2004









In The

Court of Appeals

For the

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01–04–00429–CV

____________


IN RE SOHAIL ALAM, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus





MEMORANDUM OPINIONRelator, Sohail Alam, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the following orders of the trial court : (1) the October 30, 2003 order styled “Agreed Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Judgment” and (2) the order denying “Relator’s Motion to Set Aside Settlement Agreement.” Relator also complains that the trial court “has ‘prohibited’ and ‘prevented’ the Relator from conducting further discovery and has granted Medistar [Corporation]’s 16 motions to quash discovery.”

          After due consideration, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Alcala.