Legal Research AI

Amal Bennis v. Westgate Apartment, Aimco, Wilmar Industries, Inc., Interline Brands, Inc.

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2005-05-06
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion

Opinion issued May 6, 2005









In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas





NO. 010401187CV





AMAL BENNIS, Appellant


V.


WESTGATE APARTMENT, AIMCO, WILMAR INDUSTRIES, INC., INTERLINE BRANDS, INC., Appellee





On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-32269





MEMORANDUM OPINIONAppellant Amal Benis has neither established indigence, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Amal Bennis did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution for failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. All pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Nuchia, and Keyes.