Opinion issued October 19, 2006
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-00773-CR
____________
IN RE RICHARD ADDISON, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Richard Addison, filed in this Court a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that respondent did not perform a ministerial duty. According to the petition, relator requests that this Court make a finding:
“...that the Respondent did not transmit documents to the Court of Criminal Appeals within a reasonable time after the date they were requested...Petitioner prays for an Order Directing the Respondent to transmit a copy of the application for brief in support for motion for court appointed attorney, any answers filed and a certificate reciting the date upon which that finding was made to the Court of Criminal Appeals as directed in Article 11.07...of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and as requested in petitioner’s letter...”
We deny the petition.
We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). This Court has no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings seeking relief from final felony judgments. That jurisdiction lies exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717-18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding); Tex. Code.
The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Hanks.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).