Opinion issued March 30, 2006
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-05-00800-CR
____________
ERNEST BROWN, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 351st District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 842547
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Ernest Brown, Jr., pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and, in accordance with his plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for a period of seven years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt alleging that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision. Appellant pleaded not true to allegations that he violated his the terms and condition of his probation by committing the offense of indecency with a child and, to the allegation that he failed to report to his community supervision officer as ordered by the court for the month of February 2002. Appellant pleaded true to the allegation that he failed to perform community service restitution at the court-ordered rate. After a hearing on the motion to adjudicate, the trial court found all three allegations in the motion to adjudicate to be true and adjudicated appellant guilty of the felony offense of aggravated assault. The trial court then sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty years. We affirm.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit. Counsel’s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of arguable grounds of error. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref’d).
Counsel represents that he has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).
Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings and Alcala.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).