Bertral Cheneir King v. State

Opinion issued January 19, 2006                                                    









In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-05-01132-CR

____________


BERTRAL CHENEIR KING, Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1036414




 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Appellant pleaded guilty to the second degree felony offense of robbery and, in accordance with his plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

               In a plea-bargained case in which the punishment assessed does not exceed the plea agreement, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after obtaining the trial court’s permission to appeal. Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 648-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

               The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal in this case states that this is a plea-bargained case and appellant has no right to appeal. The record supports the correctness of the certification. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We must dismiss an appeal if the trial court’s certification shows there is no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

               Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings, and Alcala.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).