Opinion issued December 28, 2007
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-00024-CR
____________
RAHKEEN JOBAR COLEMAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 228th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1020080
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Rahkeen Jobar Coleman, pleaded guilty to the offense of theft, and the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, and placed appellant on community supervision for two years. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate guilt. After a hearing on the motion, the trial court found to be true the State's allegation that appellant had violated the condition of his community supervision by committing an offense against the laws of this State. The court found appellant guilty of the original charge, and sentenced him to confinement for 10 years and assessed a $10,000 fine. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We affirm.
Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error, that the appeal is without merit and is frivolous, and that the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, (1967. The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex. Crim. App.1978).
Counsel represents that he has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. (1)
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Bland.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1.