Opinion issued September 20, 2007
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-00835-CR
____________
ALBERTO VELASCO PEREZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 228th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1041353
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Alberto Velasco Perez, pleaded guilty to the offense of murder without an agreement as to punishment with the State. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report. After a hearing, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 99 years. We affirm.
Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error, that the appeal is without merit and is frivolous, and that the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, (1967). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex. Crim. App.1978).
Counsel represents that she has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. (1)
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Bland.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1.