Steven Gregory Ellis v. Southwest Suburban Development Co., Inc.

Opinion issued March 27, 2008








In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-07-01096-CV

____________


STEVEN GREGORY ELLIS, Appellant


V.


SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., Appellee





On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05CV142585





MEMORANDUM OPINION

          We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. More than 10 days ago, appellee, Southwest Suburban Development Co., Inc., filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, asserting that appellant failed to timely file his brief, due January 31, 2008. Appellant, Steven Gregory Ellis has filed no response to appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

          On December 31, 2007, the Clerk of the Court filed the clerk’s record. The same day, she sent appellant a notice advising him that the clerk’s record had been filed that day and that if there were no reporter’s record, appellant’s brief was due in 30 days. There is no reporter’s record in this case as the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s wrongful foreclosure suit is based on granting appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s suit, not on the basis of an evidentiary hearing or trial. In his docketing statement, appellant acknowledges that there is no reporter’s record in this case. Appellant is on notice of the deadline to file his brief by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a) (requiring appellant’s brief to be filed within 30 days of the date of filing of the clerk’s record if there is no reporter’s record), the Clerk of the Court’s December 31, 2007 notice letter, and appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s brief is over 40 days past due and he has filed no motion to extend time to file his brief reasonably explaining the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d); 10.5(b).

          We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Alcala.