Opinion issued October 23, 2009
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-09-00821-CR
____________
IN RE CARLOS A. ARMENTA, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court to compel respondent to rule on a post-conviction motion that he claims to have filed in trial court cause number 9402665 on June 17, 2009.
Relator pleaded guilty to the offense of murder. After a presentence investigation hearing, the trial court sentenced relator to confinement for 40 years and signed a final judgment in this case on December 8, 1995. No direct appeal was taken. Therefore, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was January 7, 1996. The trial court's judgment of conviction is final.
Relator contends in his petition that the conviction in cause number is void because he was 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense and that he was never certified to stand trial as an adult. (1)
Jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2008); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2008); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.59 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
Therefore, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
We deny all pending motions as moot.PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley and Sharp.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1.