Opinion issued June 3, 2009
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-09-00296-CR
____________
IN RE JOE VIDALES, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed in this Court a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. In his petition relator prays that this Court grant his “Writ of Mandamus on D. N. A. testing.” We deny the petition.
Relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. For example, it does not include a designation of the parties, a complete list of all parties, a table of contents, an index of authorities, an appendix that contains a certified or sworn copy of any order or opinion complained of , or any other document showing the matter complained of, and relator does not certify that he has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 52.3(j),(k). Moreover, relator has not certified that he has served the respondent trial court judge. Tex. R. App. P. 9.5.
Although we generously read a pro se litigant’s petition in an original proceeding we will hold “the relator to the same procedural standards we apply to other litigants.” See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).
Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
We deny any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Bland.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).