Lana Wilson Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-03-366-CV

 
 

LANA WILSON SCOGGIN                                                       APPELLANT

 

V.

 

MIDFIRST BANK                                                                      APPELLEE

 
 

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

        On April 1, 2004, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

        Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

 

                                                                  PER CURIAM

 
 

PANEL D:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 27, 2004


NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.