Tanidra Rose Dedrick, Tommy Dedrick and Tanenankhaha Andrews v. First Preference Mortgage Corp., Barrett Burke Wilson Castle Daffin & Frappier, Esteban H. Gonzales, and Gregory T. Pratt

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXASFORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-05-098-CV

 
 

TANIDRA ROSE DEDRICK, TOMMY                                       APPELLANTS

DEDRICK, AND TANENANKHAHA

ANDREWS

 

V.

 

FIRST PREFERENCE MORTGAGE                                              APPELLEES

CORP., BARRETT BURKE WILSON

CASTLE DAFFIN & FRAPPIER, ESTEBAN

H. GONZALES, AND GREGORY T. PRATT

 
 

------------

 

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

------------

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

 

------------

        Appellants attempt to appeal from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Barrett Burke Wilson Castle Daffin & Frappier, Esteban H. Gonzales, and Gregory T. Pratt.  On April 19, 2005, we notified appellants that we were concerned that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the order granting summary judgment is a partial summary judgment that does not dispose of all parties in the case, and it does not appear to be a final appealable interlocutory order.  See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 192-93 (Tex. 2001).  We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  No response has been filed.

        Because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, it is the opinion of the court that this case should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

 
 

                                                          PER CURIAM

 
 
 

PANEL D:   WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

 

DELIVERED: May 26, 2005


NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.