NYC 999, LLC and Amalgamated Gadget, L.P. v. John D. Phillips, Bryan D. Yokley, W. Todd Chmar, Walter J. Burmeister, Kirby J. Campbell, Bryan Cipoletti, Steven J. Clearman, John P. Imlay, Jr., Massimo Prelz Oltramonti, John P. Rigas, Carl E. Sanders, Dru A. Sedwick, Lawrence C. Tucker

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-06-295-CV

 

NYC 999, LLC AND AMALGAMATED                                    APPELLANTS

GADGET, L.P.                                                                                    

                                                   V.

 

JOHN D. PHILLIPS, BRYAN D. YOKLEY,                                   APPELLEES

W. TODD CHMAR, WALTER J. BURMEISTER,

KIRBY J. CAMPBELL, BRYAN CIPOLETTI,

STEVEN J. CLEARMAN, JOHN P. IMLAY, JR.,

MASSIMO PRELZ OLTRAMONTI, JOHN P.

RIGAS, CARL E. SANDERS, DRU A.

SEDWICK, LAWRENCE C. TUCKER, MICHAEL

F. MIES, AND HENRY C. LYON                                                             

 

                                                                                                       

                                               ----------

            FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered AAppellants= Unopposed Voluntary Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).


Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  November 16, 2006



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.