Christopher T. Butts v. State

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

 

                                       NOS.  2-06-242-CR

         2-06-243-CR

         2-06-244-CR

         2-06-245-CR

         2-06-246-CR

 

 

CHRISTOPHER T. BUTTS                                                      APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

 

                                              ------------

 

           FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                   MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] ON REHEARING

 

                                              ------------


This court issued its original opinion and judgments on September 28, 2006.  Due to a clerical error, the court failed to mail a copy of the opinion and judgments to Appellant.  See Tex. R. App. P. 48.1(d).  Therefore, on our own motion, we withdraw our September 28, 2006 opinion and judgments and substitute the following.  See Tex. R. App. P. 49.3.

Appellant Christopher T. Butts, pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial court=s denial of his motion for judgments nunc pro tunc in five cases.  We do not have jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.  Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.CCorpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.CWaco 2002, pet. dism=d); Moffatt v. State, No. 2‑05‑372‑CR, 2005 WL 3082253, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth November 17, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.).

On July 19, we notified Appellant that we were concerned that we lacked jurisdiction over these appeals and that we would dismiss the appeals unless  any party desiring to continue the appeals filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We received no response.  Therefore, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL D:   GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  November 2, 2006



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.