|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-06-218-CV
VALLEY VIEW OIL OPERATIONS, LLC APPELLANT
V.
SUNRISE OIL, LTD APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
Appellant Valley View Oil Operations, LLC attempts to appeal from a judgment signed by the trial court on March 28, 2006, after a bench trial. Appellant filed an untimely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on April 19, 2006, two days after the twenty-day deadline for such a request. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 297. An untimely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law does not extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Thus, Appellant=s notice of appeal was due on April 28, 2006, but Appellant did not file the notice until June 19, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.
Because Appellant=s notice of appeal appeared untimely, we notified it on July 20, 2006 of our concern that this court may not have jurisdiction over the appeal and requested a response advising the court whether Appellant timely mailed its request for findings of fact and conclusions of law to the trial court clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant responded by stating that it did not mail the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, but rather hand-delivered them to the trial court clerk on April 19, 2006.
The times for filing a notice of appeal are jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because Appellant=s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 24, 2006
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.