|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-480-CR
ZECHARIAH LAVAN COLEMAN APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered the AMotion To Dismiss Appeal@ filed by Zechariah Lavan Coleman, pro se. The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.[2] See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: AUGUST 17, 2006
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4
[2]Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, and brief in support thereof, stating the appeal is frivolous under the guidelines of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Because appellant has voluntarily dismissed his appeal, we need not address counsel=s motion.