Thomas Harris and All Other Occupants v. Kathy Griffith

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-05-286-CV

THOMAS HARRIS AND                                                       APPELLANTS

ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS                                                             

 

                                                   V.

 

KATHY GRIFFITH                                                                   APPELLEE

                                               ----------

              FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF WISE COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------


On November 17, 2005, we notified Appellants that their brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)  and stated that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless Appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension.  Thereafter, we granted three extensions in response to motions for extension filed by Vicki King, pro se.  On February 28, 2006, we ordered that Appellants= brief was due on April 14, 2006, and stated that no further extensions would be granted.  We have not received Appellants= brief.

Because Appellants have not filed a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

 

 

PER CURIAM              

 

 

PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.     

 

DELIVERED: May 11, 2006

 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.